Color coded surgery

Posted in Biochemistry, Chemistry, Medicine, Surgery with tags , , , , , , , on December 28, 2011 by Paul Reinerfelt

Brilliant! In this TED-video from october 2011, Quyen Nguyen describes how they developed fluorescent dyes that only attaches itself to tumours (through some clever molecular engineering) to, literally, highlight where that tumour is! The surgeon can then be pretty definite that they have excised all the tumour growths. It can be used to highlight metastatic lymph-nodes so that the unaffected nodes can be spared. She briefly mentions that they used the same molecular “smart tagging” to attach Gadolinium to the tumour to make non-invasive diagnosis via MRI possible. They were also able to tag nerves with different colours so that the surgeon can avoid nerves passing through the tumour.

So far, this technology only exists in the lab but its great potential will probably move it into the operating rooms very soon.


China’s Floating Casino dons Advanced Radar and Defensive Weapons

Posted in Politics, Security on December 27, 2011 by Paul Reinerfelt

Anyone care to play the odds at this “casino”?

CYBER ARMS - Computer Security

China’s new Aircraft Carrier, the “Varyag”, was caught in this US Satellite photo while performing sea trials in the Yellow Sea.

According to U.S. Naval War College professor Andrew Erickson, the Aircraft Carrier carries advanced radar and defensive weapons:

“… it already possesses a Dragon Eye phased-array radar, a new point-defense missile system, and a new close-in weapon system. The Dragon Eye can reportedly track up to a hundred targets while engaging fifty simultaneously, detect targets out to sixty-five nautical miles (120 kilometers), and track targets out to 48.6 nautical miles (ninety kilometers).”

The Varyag, originally an unfinished Soviet Union warship was purchased by a Chinese company from the Ukraine, and is China’s first aircraft carrier.

And herein lies the problem, it is not supposed to be an aircraft carrier, but a floating casino!

To get permission to buy the ship from the Ukraine, China had to agree not…

View original post 105 more words

Regarding your Christmas Theropod

Posted in Aves, Dinosaurs, Maniraptora, Paraves, Saurischia, Science, Theropoda with tags , , on December 26, 2011 by Paul Reinerfelt

Now, it is not traditional here in Sweden (we are partial to Sus scrofa here), but in many countries, including most of the English-speaking ones, it is customary to consume a roasted Theropod (specifically, a meleagridine galliform ornithothoracine pygostylian avialian eumaniraptoran paravian metornithine maniraptoran maniraptoriform tyrannoraptoran coelurosaurian avetheropodan tetanurine averostran neotheropod theropod) during Christmas.

And while you enjoyed your Paravian Maniraptor, I trust you did notice the derived features of an advanced Theropod? If not, you can check out the details of your Christmas Theropod.

Dromeosaurs may have hunted like eagles.

Posted in Accipitridae, Aves, Deinonychosauria, Deinonychus, Dinosaurs, Dromaeosauridae, Maniraptora, Paraves, Saurischia, Science, Theropoda with tags , , on December 23, 2011 by Paul Reinerfelt

On this day, when the darkness starts to recede again, it seems appropriate to reboot my blog.

A group of researchers from Montana have conducted an excellent study of the feet of Dromeosaurs (colloquially called “raptors”) and compared them to the feet of extant raptors (birds of prey). The result is surprising. The morphology of the Dromeosaur foot seems to indicate that they, despite Jurassic Park, did not run down their prey (as their cousins, the Troodonts did) and then kill it with a quick slash of the infamous “killer claw”. Instead, the team found that the Dromeosaur (specifically Deinonychus) foot most resembled that of extant Accipitridae (hawks and eagles). Interestingly, these raptors often capture prey that is too big to fly away with. Instead, they subdue their prey by staying on top, anchoring themselves with their enlarged second toe, pinning down the victim with their body weight. Meanwhile they start tearing at it with their beaks, exposing skin and effectively starting to eat their prey while it still lives! (I believe the word is “Ouch!”.) Needless to say, the victim does not stay alive for long after the raptor has started eating, blood loss and organ failure quickly puts an end to the agony.

So, it seems probable that Dromeosaurs did something similar. Their feet are comparatively robust and more built for strength that speed, consistent with a grasping function. The hypertrophied DII claw is sunk deep into the prey, anchoring the animal so it has less chance to escape. Meanwhile, what does the Dromeosaur do?

This is where it gets really interesting, to keep itself on top of the victim, the Dromeosaur would be flapping its arms to retain its balance. We know that the Dromeosaurs wore feathers, possibly longer on the arms. The vigorous stability flapping typically executed by the raptor in order to first get on top of its prey, then to constantly maintain this position, allowing it to use its full bodyweight to pin its victim to the ground, is suggested by the research-group to be the precursor to wing-flapping needed for flight! It provides a plausible explanation for pre-flight flapping as well as a reason for the arm-feathers to become enlarged. This is because, when not flapping, the Dromeosaur would try to keep its arms around the prey, to keep it disoriented and preventing it from escaping. Extant hawks and eagles also do this, it is called “mantling”, and is greatly helped by a “cloak” of feathers from the arms. Both adaptations are useful in themselves and at the same time it would be of great use for gliding and later flight. The grasping foot of the Dromeosaur would also be easily amended for perching.

All in all, a compelling and plausible explanation for the origin of wings and flapping behaviour in the whole Paraves clade.

Royal Religion

Posted in Reason on June 19, 2010 by Paul Reinerfelt

Sweden is currently buzzing with the wedding of Crown Princess Victoria. I couldn’t care less about the wedding as such but there is one aspect that is an annoying residue from old ignorance.

The other day, I was on the fringes of a discussion regarding this wedding when someone wondered aloud regarding the religious views of the Crown Princess. I immediately stated that she is an Evangelical Lutheran. When questioned about how I could be so confident in this (not being even acquainted with the Princess), I just replied “Last time I checked, she was still the heiress-apparent, ergo, she is of the Evangelical Lutheran denomination”.

You see, there is this paragraph in the Swedish constitution, §4 of the Act of Succession to be precise, which specifically states that any member of the Royal Family that is not of “pure evangelical faith” as it is proclaimed in the Augsburg Confession, forfeit all rights of succession for themselves and their heirs.

Personally, I find it appalling that we (Sweden) in this day and age have laws that requires people (however few) to publicly subscribe to a religious view to remain in office! Even worse, in this case it is not just law, the Act of Succession is part of the Swedish Constitution!
That’s right, Swedish Constitution requires members of the Royal Family to (at least publicly) profess to belief in ignorant superstition to remain in office!

It is not even the case that it is a forgotten paragraph that no-one has bothered to clean up, oh no, it was diligently transferred from the Instrument of Government (Swedish: Regeringsformen) when it was revised in 1974 to remove most of the influence of the monarch on the actual government of the country. The paragraph even specifically states that the purpose of the paragraph is to uphold the intentions of the older Instrument of Government from 1809!

To make maters worse, the Augsburg Confession is a particularly nasty piece of dogma, repeatedly stressing that those of other faiths should be condemned (and why), in some cases several times. So, given that §4 of the Act of Succession requires the royal children to be brought up in the doctrine laid out in the Augsburg Confession, if our King wants to uphold the Constituion of his country then, sensu stricto, he must bring up his children to condemn muslims and other heretics! And so must princess Victoria when she has kids of her own! Strange as it sounds, I sincerely hope that our King does not respect the Swedish Constitution!